My name is Kristina McBride.

I write books.

 Welcome to my website.

Follow Me!

Buy Now!

The Syntax Of Agreement

Also keep in mind the agreement that has been shown to be also in the subjunctive mind. In nomine sentences, the adjectives do not show a match with the noun, although pronouns do. z.B. a szép k-nyveitekkel “with your beautiful books” (“szép”: nice): the suffixes of the plural, the possessive “your” and the fall marking “with” are marked only on the name. In the case of verbs, a gender agreement is less widespread, although it may still occur. In the French past, for example, the former work of the participants corresponds, in certain circumstances, to the subject or an object (for more details, see compound past). In Russian and most other Slavic languages, the form of the past in sex corresponds to the subject. 2. The Structural Condition of the Personal Agreement (SCOPA): A Functional Category F may carry the characteristics `1` or `2 if and only if an F projection is merged with an NP with this feature and if F is used as the name for the resulting sentence.

(52) Most Slavic languages are strongly bent, with the exception of Bulgarian and Macedonian. The agreement is similar to Latin, for example. B between adjectives and substants in sex, number, case and animacy (if considered a separate category). The following examples are taken from the Serbo-Croatian: Here are some specific cases for the Verb verb chord of Diekont in English: On the other hand, the functional sheath, projected on an adjective sentence, is noted as FAP in 4, a descriptive position. Therefore, a predictive rate, perhaps led by a copula, is required to provide an ap-themed home. In this configuration, an FA marked for anyone violates the SCOPA, because FAP is not merged with an NP with the person function. Therefore, there can be no agreement of persons that is indicated by [1] in 4. Case agreement is not an essential feature of English (only personal pronouns and pronouns with a case mark). The agreement between these pronouns can sometimes be observed: in Hungarian, the verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (precision).

There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all. (Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially).

Comments are closed.

  • No categories